The idea isn't to say that tourism in typical European cities or in the US and Canada is decreasing, as a result of of course it isn't very. But if we tend to take a comparative study of the evolution of tourism during the recent years we tend to may see that the touristic growth of these typical places compared to the one connected with more exotic ones is pretty low. Everything indicates that the most effective travel destinations are about to alter soon.
If we have a tendency to take a broader study the planet, we will discover that a recent trend for countries that are on the means to develop have found that tourism is a nice means to create some income to finance their comes. Sure, the strategy isn't wrong in the first approach. If we have a tendency to don't have the cash, we tend to bring it from the surface. This should work and after all it does work, but not everything is written in pink. There's conjointly black there, and very black. They've become the most effective travel destinations but they're going to have a high worth to pay because of that.
What's happening is that in the hurry to develop nice touristic attractive locations and funding publicity campaigns the cash is not going where it ought to be. In the end, and going a small amount to the extreme scenario, the result is that conditions on the living standards of folks in the country keep being the identical while tourists are enjoying an incredible lifestyle, even with low costs compared to their home countries. And this can be what's happening with a number of the simplest touristic destinations like Brazil, India, China, Turkey, Venezuela or Thailand, along with a rise of tourism in countries in Eastern Europe.
And from my purpose of view what's happening is merely as a result of governments are failing in the approach they offer to tourism. In my opinion, tourism does not would like to mean luxury hotels and big resorts with expensive personnel or nice museums and exhibitions. Many of these countries have the wonder in the sights, within the history you'll feel within the streets of their towns and cities, in nature. Taking the instance of some African countries, I think about absolutely wrong to create up 5 star hotels in the center of the jungle. They simply do not fit. Instead, they must attempt to require a additional cultural approach and build buildings that do work with the native style, that have some which means related to the region, profiting from the exotic taste tourists may get.
Tourism should be cultural immersion and in the approach it is being done these days it fails completely with it's original purpose. In alternative words, if you would like a luxury hotel, keep visiting Paris, but please don't go down to Kenya. Unfortunately, if you go all the way down to Kenya you'll find the identical luxury hotel. Furthermore, it looks that these days in order to be one of the most effective travel destinations you would like to own a 5 star hotel standing there. That is the idea of nice vacations that people have?
On the opposite hand, I don't need to appear a person who is against prime quality hotels. Don't take me wrong. I merely suppose that everything ought to be in place and respecting the area and culture where it's placed. A 5 star hotel fits perfectly in the comfy space of central Paris, and this is not something I will discuss. It merely fits, and I personally would take it if traveling there, using any of the free travel certificates that are available on the net in bound places. Which ones, you say?
.png)
0 التعليقات :
Post a Comment